MAP Analysis

City Year Tulsa enrolled 791 students in ELA focus list for 21 weeks typically and 685 in Math focus list for 21 weeks typically

Dosage Distribution

H₀: There Is No Significant Difference On Spring MAP Percentile Score For Focus List and Non-Focus List Students (ELA and Math Focus List)

## 
##  Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
## 
## data:  testpercentile by factor(in_FL)
## W = 1215429, p-value = 0.0483
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0

## 
##  Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
## 
## data:  testpercentile by factor(in_FL)
## W = 1236918, p-value = 0.4774
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0

ELA focus list students enrolled before the Spring MAP Test received a typical median percentile score of 25 compared to 21 for non-ELA focus list students.

Using the Mann-Whitney U test to compare the MAP Reading percentile scores between ELA focus list and non ELA focus list students, the test results revealed a statistically significant difference in the grade scores between the two groups (p-value = 0.048304)

Math focus list students enrolled before the Spring MAP Test received a typical median percentile score of 14 compared to 13 for non-math focus list students.

Using the Mann-Whitney U test to compare the MAP Reading percentile scores between Math focus list and non Math focus list students, the test results revealed a non-statistically significant difference in the grade scores between the two groups (p-value = 0.4774266)

Conclusion: Students enrolled in ELA focus list have a statistically significant difference of Spring MAP test percentile score compared to students not enrolled on an ELA focus list, however, there is no statistical significant difference of Spring MAP test percentile score for Mathematics focus list students when comparing students not enrolled on a Mathematics focus list

H₀: There Is No Significant Difference In MAP Percentile Growth Scores From Fall to Spring For Students Enrolled On an ELA/Math Focus List

##               Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value  Pr(>F)    
## dosage_type    3   5208  1736.2   7.488 5.4e-05 ***
## Residuals   3459 802002   231.9                    
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

##   Tukey multiple comparisons of means
##     95% family-wise confidence level
## 
## Fit: aov(formula = testpercentile_growth ~ dosage_type, data = map_growth_spring_ELA)
## 
## $dosage_type
##                                                         diff        lwr
## Low Dosage-High Dosage                            -7.6568143 -12.219127
## Moderate Dosage-High Dosage                       -6.8172189 -12.010187
## Not Enrolled On An ELA Focus List-High Dosage     -7.7098170 -11.923985
## Moderate Dosage-Low Dosage                         0.8395954  -2.815596
## Not Enrolled On An ELA Focus List-Low Dosage      -0.0530027  -2.090825
## Not Enrolled On An ELA Focus List-Moderate Dosage -0.8925981  -4.102729
##                                                         upr     p adj
## Low Dosage-High Dosage                            -3.094502 0.0000972
## Moderate Dosage-High Dosage                       -1.624251 0.0041662
## Not Enrolled On An ELA Focus List-High Dosage     -3.495649 0.0000159
## Moderate Dosage-Low Dosage                         4.494787 0.9350162
## Not Enrolled On An ELA Focus List-Low Dosage       1.984820 0.9998928
## Not Enrolled On An ELA Focus List-Moderate Dosage  2.317533 0.8913065

ELA focus list students enrolled before the Spring MAP Test grew by 1 percentage points on their Reading MAP Test compared to 0 for students not enrolled on an ELA focus list.
ELA focus list students enrolled before the Spring MAP Test has a typical fall-to-spring conditional growth of 49 percentage points on their Reading MAP Test compared to 43 for non-ELA focus list students.

## 
##  Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
## 
## data:  falltospringconditionalgrowthper by factor(in_FL)
## W = 807789, p-value = 0.4385
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0

##               Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## dosage_type    3    555   184.9   1.175  0.318
## Residuals   3334 524675   157.4

Math focus list students enrolled before the Spring MAP Test grew by -2 percentage points on their Mathematics MAP Test compared to -1 for non-Math focus list students.
Math focus list students enrolled before the Spring MAP Test has a typical fall-to-spring conditional growth of 30 percentage points on their Mathematics MAP Test compared to 33 for non-Math focus list students.

Percentile Growth and Projected Growth of MAP Scores for ELA/Math Focus List Students by Initial Percentile Range and Dosage Type

Dosage types are defined as: High Dosage - More than 900 minutes Moderate Dosage - 450 to 900 minutes Low Dosage - Less than 450 minutes

Definitions for Met Projected Growth categories are defined by NWEA

Does Suspension Days affect Spring ELA MAP Scores for Focus List Students? 2023

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_ELA_suspension$daysassigned and map_growth_spring_ELA_suspension$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 8.121e+09, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##        rho 
## -0.1732884

Does Suspension Days affect Spring ELA MAP Scores for Focus List Students? 2022

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_ELA_suspension_2022$daysassigned and map_growth_spring_ELA_suspension_2022$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 755377698, p-value = 3.367e-07
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##        rho 
## -0.1275199

Does Suspension Days affect Spring ELA MAP Scores for Focus List Students? 2019

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_ELA_suspension_2019$daysassigned and map_growth_spring_ELA_suspension_2019$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 642237797, p-value = 1.514e-07
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##        rho 
## -0.1349334

Does Suspension Days Affect Spring MAP Math Scores? 2023

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_math_suspension$daysassigned and map_growth_spring_math_suspension$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 7312232270, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##        rho 
## -0.1796204

Does Suspension Days Affect Spring MAP Math Scores? 2022

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_math_suspension_2022$daysassigned and map_growth_spring_math_suspension_2022$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 8100900252, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##        rho 
## -0.1582976

Does Suspension Days Affect Spring MAP Math Scores? 2019

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_math_suspension_2019$daysassigned and map_growth_spring_math_suspension_2019$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 3054093224, p-value = 5.387e-14
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##        rho 
## -0.1491692

Does Final ADA Affect ELA MAP Scores? 2023

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_ELA_ada$cum_ada_district and map_growth_spring_ELA_ada$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 5564156911, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##       rho 
## 0.1961164

Does Final ADA Affect ELA MAP Scores? 2022

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_ELA_ada_2022$final_ada and map_growth_spring_ELA_ada_2022$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 618099745, p-value = 0.002015
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##        rho 
## 0.07738903

Does Final ADA Affect ELA MAP Scores? 2021

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_ELA_ada_2021$final_ada and map_growth_spring_ELA_ada_2021$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 260685374, p-value = 2.896e-08
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##       rho 
## 0.1574173

Does Final ADA Affect ELA MAP Scores? 2019

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_ELA_ada_2019$final_ada and map_growth_spring_ELA_ada_2019$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 12022, p-value = 0.5564
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##        rho 
## 0.09223559

Does Final ADA Affect Math MAP Scores? 2023

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_math_ada$cum_ada_district and map_growth_spring_math_ada$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 4866690992, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##      rho 
## 0.214898

Does Final ADA Affect Math MAP Scores? 2022

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_math_ada_2022$final_ada and map_growth_spring_math_ada_2022$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 5739945803, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##       rho 
## 0.1792807

Does Final ADA Affect Math MAP Scores? 2021

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_math_ada_2021$final_ada and map_growth_spring_math_ada_2021$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 2962359564, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##       rho 
## 0.2329964

Does Final ADA Affect Math MAP Scores? 2019

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  map_growth_spring_math_ada_2019$final_ada and map_growth_spring_math_ada_2019$testpercentile_Spring
## S = 3194615, p-value = 0.01462
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##      rho 
## 0.145272